<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kristofer Mencák &#187; Duncan Watts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kristofermencak.com/tag/duncan-watts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kristofermencak.com</link>
	<description>... on customer satisfaction, word of mouth, social media, buzz, viral marketing and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Content, context and predicting viral spread</title>
		<link>http://www.kristofermencak.com/2009/09/content-context-and-predicting-viral-spread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kristofermencak.com/2009/09/content-context-and-predicting-viral-spread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer Mencák</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word of Mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic reproductive number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristofermencak.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Molly Flatt from 1000heads pointed towards an article in New Scientist lately. Spanish researchers José Luis Iribarren from IBM and Esteban Moro at the Carlos III University in Madrid developed a method to accurately predict how quickly and widely new pieces of information, or &#8220;memes&#8220;, will spread. &#8220;The secret, they say, is to recognise the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a title="1000heads" href="http://www.1000heads.com/?p=1897">Molly Flatt from 1000heads pointed towards</a> an <a title="New Scientist" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17581-infectious-people-spread-memes-across-the-web.html">article in New Scientist lately</a>. Spanish researchers José Luis Iribarren from IBM and Esteban Moro at the Carlos III University in Madrid developed a method to accurately predict how quickly and widely new pieces of information, or &#8220;<a title="Internet memes" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme">memes</a>&#8220;, will spread.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The secret, they say, is to recognise the fact that people vary in how &#8220;infectious&#8221; they are when it comes to sharing content online. While some people pass on things they receive right away, others do so after some delay, or not at all.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Basically, they combine the <a title="Basic reproductive number" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_reproduction_number">basic reproductive number</a>, R<sub>0, </sub>with some expectation of the variation in the time it takes for people to respond to a meme ( i.e. pass it along). They had found there was a huge variation at the individual level.</p>
<p>Combining these two numbers, the researchers could build a model to predict the meme&#8217;s spread.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The model cannot predict whether a piece of content will go viral before it has been released; only its likely reach once it starts spreading.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The fact that individuals differ in whether and how fast they pass things on is hardly news. But the ability to predict the final results/reach of a campaign is no doubt interesting.</p>
<p>Also, it is interesting to consider the differences between  a campaign which might attract a &#8220;slower&#8221; audience, creating a longer and thinner peak in the statistics, compared to a more classic viral that peaks rather quickly and then enters a kind of &#8220;long tail&#8221; phase.</p>
<p>Two final notes:</p>
<p>First, in the article, <a title="David Liben-Nowell" href="http://www.cs.carleton.edu/faculty/dlibenno/">David Liben-Nowell</a> notes that: &#8220;&#8230;people may vary in infectiousness depending on the type of content they receive.&#8221; This is highly dependant on how well targeted the content is to them. If they are attracted by it, the likelihood they will spread it is higher and I assume they will also pass it on quicker.</p>
<p>Second, just as <a title="Fast Company - Is the Tipping Point toast?" href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/122/is-the-tipping-point-toast.html">Duncan Watts says</a>, context, or <a title="Influentials not as influential." href="http://www.kristofermencak.com/2008/10/influentials-not-as-influential/">how receptive a society as a whole is to an idea</a>, is extremely important. I assume this too will affect if people will pass something on, as well as how quick they are to push the &#8220;send&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kristofermencak.com/2009/09/content-context-and-predicting-viral-spread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

